QUOTE (tinnidawg @ Apr 26 2007, 09:51 PM)

Similarly, I think everyone has good, bad etc as a part of their personalities, the hat looks for the one trait that is predominant. In Slytherin it is ambition, but aren't Gryffindors also ambitious? If they aren't wanting to win the house cup, or Hermione wanting to be the best student should not be a part of the storyline. Similarly, Hufflepuff stands for Loyalty, a person can also be loyal to a cause we think is wrong.
I think what JKR would probably like to point out is the qualities in themselves aren't wrong, it is what a person does with the quality, that will ultimately decide the kind of person they become.
Something like a knife, a knife is used by surgeons to save lives and it can take lives when wielded by murderers, the knife itself remains the same.
Oooo, tinnidawg, I like your way of thinking!
I agree that just belonging to some House doesn't mean that a person is good or bad. Look at Slughorn,a good guy he is.
I think the thing that makes some Slytherins bad is not the House, but the pure-blood and superiority thing, cos it's usually parents who insert such thoughts into their children.
The only question for me is that Gryffindors are supposed to be brave in some kind, and I don't see such a quality in Peter. He seems too be a coward, at least in previous books.